GM should be fired on the spot. Near league minimum Quick must be enjoying this.
Rob Blake should of definitely been fired after that mess.
If the Capitals can get the good version of PLD this is a huge win for them.
No he still has it. It starts July 1.
No he still has it. It starts July 1.
Wow the Sharks really did the Rangers a solid here.
Everyone understands his role. Hes just making 2-3 times as much as he should. The fact that he had SJ on his no trade list is pretty funny.Sharks needed to hit the cap floor and Goodrow is a great locker room guy. I think a lot of people misunderstood his actual role as a grinder. I think with all the young people SJ has coming up he could be a net positive, considering they won't be contending for a long time still.
Everyone understands his role. Hes just making 2-3 times as much as he should. The fact that he had SJ on his no trade list is pretty funny.
I read that is actually why they picked him up from waivers to bypass his no trade list. Apparently there will be a trade between Sharks and Rangers and it will have compensation for the Shark taking him of the Rangers hand.
That sounds somewhat sketchy if it's out in the open like that to avoid a NMC...no?
No it will not. Thats why there are 2 different clauses. No Move and No Trade. No Move means they cant waive you or trade you. Goodrow only had a No Trade, so he can still be waived and claimed or sent to the AHL.Yeah, it is. I'm sure Goodrow isn't happy to end up on a team on his no move list. I'm sure it'll come up in the next CBA discussions that players put on waivers cannot be picked up by team on their NMC list.
I'm sure it's a case of verbal future consideration type thing where Rangers for example will add a 2nd round pick to any trade deal between the 2 teams.
No it will not. Thats why there are 2 different clauses. No Move and No Trade. No Move means they cant waive you or trade you. Goodrow only had a No Trade, so he can still be waived and claimed or sent to the AHL.
Those situations do happen. The Flyers did one last summer with the Hurricanes. Nothing really sketchy about it at all.I'm thinking more about the idea of a quietly obvious extra compensation added to some trade where it came out it was the "price" to be able to get the player waived so they could claim him. Extremely unlikely anything ever actually came to light with evidence, but would be a situation, I'd think.