NVidia GeForce RTX 50x0 cards - 70% performance increase, but AI > you

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
Furry

Furry

🌭🍔🇺🇦✌️SLAVA UKRAINI!✌️🇺🇦🍔🌭
<Gold Donor>
22,577
29,824
4k seems like a waste, im gonna stay at 1080 on my 5090.
 
  • 2Worf
  • 2Solidarity
  • 1Double Worf
Reactions: 5 users
Leadsalad

Leadsalad

Cis-XYite-Nationalist
6,234
13,016
gak said:
View attachment 570410
NVIDIA May Aim For Up To 16 Generated Frames With Multi-Frame Generation Tech In Future DLSS Technology

Even though multi-frame generation is already significantly ahead of frame generation, NVIDIA might aim for even a higher mark than it currently does. In an interview, NVIDIA showed interest in multiplying the FPS several times with future DLSS versions. However, it won't be that simple and might not be necessary as NVIDIA says that the current multi-frame generation is quite sufficient for gamers.

Still, NVIDIA says that they can achieve up to 16 frames per second with future DLSS MFG, and if that benefits the gamers, they may improve the MFG to such a level. As per the Q&A, it seems like NVIDIA wants to settle for three frames per second at the moment since it's already multiplying the FPS several times.

The multi-frame generation technique uses the latest transformer model and adds 'fake' frames to the gameplay to increase the smoothness of gameplay. By analyzing the scenes carefully through an advanced AI model, the current DLSS 4 technology is much more advanced than it was initially. NVIDIA has showcased the performance difference between native and DLSS 4 MFG scenarios, which can increase the fps by up to eight times.

If NVIDIA adds 16 fake frames in between the original ones, it might be just too much and may introduce weird AI artifacts, distortions, or anomalies to the visuals. Also, fake frames still won't be able to compete with the quality of original frames and won't offer a similar smooth performance. Three fake frames look quite sufficient for now, but of course, the future of DLSS and MFG depends on what NVIDIA thinks is better for gamers.

View attachment 570411
Click to expand...
Timestamped to the frame gen future we're in for

 
gak

gak

<Gold Donor>
1,935
10,242
Leadsalad said:
Timestamped to the frame gen future we're in for
Click to expand...
n.jpg
 
  • 13Worf
Reactions: 12 users
rhinohelix

rhinohelix

Dental Dammer
<Gold Donor>
3,161
5,239
Palum said:
holy fuck at those prices lmao
Click to expand...
They are just indeed trying to get scalpers prices for themselves. I know it seems like a foolish hill to die on but that extra $200 bucks for a 5080 is a bridge too far me right now. Without competition, all of these corps are rapacious bastards but Nvidia in particular. I won't be building anything new until end of Q1, who knows where things will be.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
G

Grez

Trakanon Raider
1,111
906
i think it's also an issue for those of us who build a new comp once every 10 bloody years and we're too lazy to upgrade. We want a beast that will last until it becomes so slow that it pisses us of and we build a new one. Maybe this is just me. The time is nearly at hand... still using a 20+ year old hard drive.

From what i've seen, the best GPU 7 years ago is still kinda competitive today, not with the high-end gpus, but probably passable enough for me not to yeet my computer out the window.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users
Chapell

Chapell

Trakanon Raider
594
687
If these fucking cards can't run games, let's say like Wukong maxed at 120 fps @1080p without any supersampling crap, i don't see the point buying one.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Intrinsic

Intrinsic

Person of Whiteness
<Gold Donor>
15,343
13,762
Color me kind of shocked the 5080 is only $1300. Still more interested in the 5070 TI pricing if, and that's a hard if, I'm going to consider upgrading.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.