This is now how people in the rickshaw user group see the forum. Is this okay for me to do or do I need a vote on this also?
'Give me one good reason why you can't just leave it the way it was?'
- 1
This is now how people in the rickshaw user group see the forum. Is this okay for me to do or do I need a vote on this also?
Because shaw'd people can't post in them in screenshots. Person gets shaw'd. Person can post in shaw. The rest of the zoo can go into the shaw and taunt them. This is our way. Moving the threads doesn't really seem to accomplish anything. I don't know.You haven't answered this question yet.
'Give me one good reason why you can't just leave it the way it was?'
'Give me one good reason why you can't just leave it the way it was?'
So then if I can post whatever I want in my special personal thread in the rickshaw where is the "punishment"?Because shaw'd people can't post in them in screenshots. Person gets shaw'd. Person can post in shaw. The rest of the zoo can go into the shaw and taunt them. This is our way. Moving the threads doesn't really seem to accomplish anything. I don't know.
Because the way it was is being abused by a toxic poster who seeks only to disrupt the community and create conflict in it, a troll poster who was given plenty of rope to hang himself with many times over, and has chosen every single time to make sure and do so with glee.
You mean the way it was up until 6 months ago under Draegan whom we all thought was shit?'Give me one good reason why you can't just leave it the way it was?'
You mean, he did this in a thread in the Rickshaw? Do you need your own safespace because Tanoomba's safespace triggered you somehow?
So then if I can post whatever I want in my special personal thread in the rickshaw where is the "punishment"?
Defend Tanoomba? So is that what we're doing? So then this change is only in reaction to Tanoomba? Is that true @a_skeleton_03
Because the way it was is being abused by a toxic poster who seeks only to disrupt the community and create conflict in it, a troll poster who was given plenty of rope to hang himself with many times over, and has chosen every single time to make sure and do so with glee.
Ok, so we're just going to start changing shit around to punish Tanoomba instead of banning him? You don't find that utterly retarded? I'm not defending Tanoomba. He's only collaterally defended by me complaining about the change. He was only collaterally protected in the GamerGate thread by me being completely hands-off in the moderation there. It wasn't to protect him, but simply because I wasn't going to start shaw'ing people I was directly involved in arguing and shit-posting on."Hey guys we're totally playing the exact role he wants us to play in the game he started when he began shitting in the Gamergate thread 3 days ago, but we're totally not defending him!"
Yes, you are. Spades are spades, and ducks are ducks and roses are roses.
Its funny that the only way you and Picasso and Soy, etc. can defend Tanoomba in this instance is by adopting Tanoomba's dishonest attempts to "make everyone equal all the time".
Sorry, your logical fallacy is false equivalency and also, butthurt. Lots of butthurt.
You fucking retards are so stupid. So fucking stupid. Like Tanoomba wasn't intentionally trying to get this exact sort of situation going when he walked into the Gamergate thread that day.
But hodji...banning Tanoomba for that...would be an abuse of Mod powers. Are you saying that you'd willingly abuse your Mod powers if you were a Mod?He should have been banned by you fucking retards ages ago.
Nope not at all. If you remember I was one of the people who complained the worst about "victory laps" on RR.Defend Tanoomba? So is that what we're doing? So then this change is only in reaction to Tanoomba? Is that true @a_skeleton_03
Ok, so we're just going to start changing shit around to punish Tanoomba instead of banning him?
But that is what he and Mist enjoy ....You mean, besides not being able to participate in any thread outside of the Rickshaw and not being able to edit any of your posts while there? And not being able to shitpost in any non-Rickshaw threads for the duration?
This 'punishment' argument was also familiar to Draegan as well. Remember when he disabled everything in there? Pepperidge Farms remembers.
I wouldn't ban him here either, but I would ban him before I start changing rules of the entire forum just to somehow punish him. I don't feel he's done anything ban worthy, but you're already aware that my bar is pretty high for that. Too high? Perhaps.Excuse me sir, I called for Tanoomba's banning ages ago.
You are the ones who made him sacrosanct and immune from banning. No one else.
Once again we aren't "changing time honored traditions" just because your memory is shoddy. We are going back to our roots.I wouldn't ban him here either, but I would ban him before I start changing rules of the entire forum just to somehow punish him. I don't feel he's done anything ban worthy, but you're already aware that my bar is pretty high for that. Too high? Perhaps.