LolketoJust found this absolute gem on /r/ketogains
"I've only been on Keto for about 9 1/2 weeks. I was drinking avocado oil, about 5-600kcal worth/daily in order to keep calories high enough without overeating on protein. For me, bulking on keto is a nightmare. I'm going back to drinking oil in order to maintain 4,000kcal/day. I'm not sure if I'll end up gaining or just maintain."
Wrong and I am living proof. Until about 2 weeks ago I was in and out of Ketosis (mostly in ketosis during the week and out of it on the weekends, what many people call carb cycling though not quite at the level of detail most other people put into it). I lost 10 lbs and lifts gained massively. Of course I'm not a newbie and was just realizing my potential again after ~5 years of not really being able to hit the gym hard.In before "Keto is outstanding, they were using ketogenic diets to help cure forms of epilepsy in the 20s!" The fact that dude is -only- at 9.5 weeks of being ketogenic says volumes about him as a person. Anybody trying for gains while in actual ketosis is just doing shit backwards.
What makes you say this?Being in ketosis, however, is definitely taking the long and unnecessary road to trying to improve strength.
I haven't bought drugs in over 10 years. I wouldn't even know where to startHave you fatties that can't lose weight tried cocaine?
Being in ketosis is inherently catabolic, and no matter how efficient the body can be trained to use fats vs. glucose, glucose is a superior fuel source. Glycogen in the muscles is directly related to how much "work" the muscles can do, and the amount of work muscles do is directly related to how they grow and strength is acquired. No matter the ketone levels or the body's adjustment, glycogen is simply going to get you further on much less, leading to more strength gains.What makes you say this?
Ketogenic Diet (high-fat, low-carb) Has Neuroprotective and Disease-modifying Effects -- Health Wellness -- Sott.netBeing in ketosis is inherently catabolic, and no matter how efficient the body can be trained to use fats vs. glucose, glucose is a superior fuel source. Glycogen in the muscles is directly related to how much "work" the muscles can do, and the amount of work muscles do is directly related to how they grow and strength is acquired. No matter the ketone levels or the body's adjustment, glycogen is simply going to get you further on much less, leading to more strength gains.
If you are carb cycling, you aren't on a "real" ketogenic diet, especially because odds are you are losing all the subjective benefits while the body readjusts to the ketosis state after coming out of it, which usually takes a couple of days. You might be the anomaly that eats carbs on weekends and then goes right back into ketosis monday morning, but for the vast majority of the world, that's not a thing. Even straight fasting takes 24-48 hours at a minimum, so you're only really in ketosis 3-4 days out of the week anyway, if you are cycling carbs every 5-6 days.
Anyway, a normal diet that contains carbs will lead to superior strength gain. If the goal is strength (like mr. 4000 calorie oil drinker up there) then ketosis is not an efficient way to do it. Can you make progress? Yeah, especially if you are effectively knocking the rust off after a couple of years out from lifting. But it is 100% not the best way to go about it, hence my statement of the road being long and unnecessary.
The more I read about ketogenic diets, the more I'm convinced they're a stupid fad. Used for treatment of very specific medical disorders? YES! But for anyone approaching normal, they are roughly as much benefit as they are detriment. You might be the anomaly, I don't know.
You've yet to prove that to me. Yet I link actual studies that refute your claims:No, I'm anti diets that don't take a balanced approach to weight loss and health. Low carb's benefits kind of turn into a wash after the body adjusts to it, and ketosis is great for specific medical conditions. But, the whole reason this came up was strength and gains. And ketosis is not a good state to be in for that. Like I said, you can make progress while in ketosis, but it will not be as efficient (hence long and unnecessary road) as being in a diet that contains adequate carbs and the body isn't actively attempting to use non-sugar resources for fuel while lifting.
Meth has a better dollar to high ratio if you are truly min/maxing your drugs.Have you fatties that can't lose weight tried cocaine?
Just get ephedrine (not pseudoephedrine) from behind the pharmacy counter (Bronkaid) and take 3 pills and you'll have zero appetite for about ten hours at least. About fifteen years ago ephedrine used to be the primary component in most workout supplements and I used to take them pre-gym for the crazy energy they'd give me, but one of the side effects was having zero appetite.Meth has a better dollar to high ratio if you are truly min/maxing your drugs.
Ok we agree. And I already did link the study that says that a low carb diet effects lean mass gain better than a high carb diet. I linked it twice in fact, once to the full text and once to the abstract.Which uh, those studies directly reference my "claims" as you like to refer to them. I'm claiming that when it comes to dieting, no matter which one you choose it will probably be effective if you stick with it, and in the long run there's really no difference between various low carb/medium carb/whatever carb diets that have a modicum of balance to them. And if you are arguing that a carb deficient diet is better than one that contains carbs for increasing strength? Please link the study that pushes that angle. It's ok, I'll wait.